Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu chose the Western Wall Tunnels in Jerusalem to make statements with religious and historical connotations, ahead of the Israeli election scheduled for 27 October 2026, amid a close contest between the parties and with neither bloc yet having a clear path to forming the next government.
We have returned... We are here, and we will remain here forever
Timing of the statements and the Likud-Yashar contest
The statements carry political significance because of their timing and location, coming about a month before the vote as Israel’s political scene remains an open contest. The latest opinion polls cited show a close race between the Yashar party, led by Gadi Eisenkot, and Likud, led by Netanyahu, while the results at bloc level remain undecided.
The Western Wall Tunnels are located in one of Jerusalem’s most sensitive areas, near Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Noble Sanctuary. Religious, historical and political considerations overlap in the area, giving rhetoric about presence and staying dimensions that go beyond a protocol visit or a solely religious occasion.
The sensitivity of the Western Wall Tunnels’ location
The approaching election, together with the nature of the statements and the chosen location, makes Netanyahu’s appearance open to interpretation in the context of the electoral contest. Security, identity and Jerusalem issues intersect in the campaign with the parties’ efforts to attract voters, even if the visit was not presented as an explicit election announcement.
Recent polls show a close race between the main parties, while the formation of a coalition reaching the 61-seat majority remains undecided. Alongside the contest between Yashar and Likud, the composition of the political blocs and the positions of smaller parties remain factors that will influence the shape of the next coalition and which side can lead the government.
Jerusalem and identity in electoral rhetoric
In this context, symbolic issues gain additional space in Israeli political rhetoric. For some voters, discussion of Jerusalem is linked to Jewish identity, security and history—subjects that can move to the forefront of election campaigns alongside the day-to-day programmes and policies put forward by the parties.
The use of religious and historical symbols can also present rhetoric that evokes ideas of steadfastness, continuity and attachment to a place. Netanyahu’s statements may resonate with voters who place Jerusalem and Jewish identity at the top of their priorities, viewing them as an affirmation of his position on an issue marked by religious and political sensitivity.
Netanyahu’s statement can also be read as an effort to project a political image built on steadfastness and continuity, as he enters a new electoral contest for leadership of the government. However, the symbolism of the site and the timing of the visit alone are not enough to establish that the tour was designed primarily as an election activity.
The visit thus combined an occasion with a religious and historical character and political timing ahead of a close vote, giving Netanyahu’s statements broad scope for political interpretation. The process of forming the government will remain linked to the results of the 27 October election and to the ability of one bloc to secure the support of 61 members in the next coalition.
